Wednesday, March 30, 2005

Best Lost episode . . . EVER?

I think so!

So many cool things happened.

Locke got screwed so many ways and looked crazy and had weird "Fight Club" visions.

And Sawyer got humiliated. And now someone on the island has glasses (is that a shout-out to Piggy from Lord of the Flies?).

And next week looks good too!!

1 Comments:

Blogger A P said...

Definitely the best yet. As Spec said, the Hurley ep was also great--but more on the funny side.

Terry O'Quinn acted the hell out of this episode. Classic stuff.

9:26 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, March 24, 2005

Slate article on iMark-up technology

I found this interesting article on Slate this morning.

It sounds like an interesting technology, and I wish that we at the office did more web-based stuff so that we could use tools like this when we edit our chapters.

But, anyway, I thought it was interesting.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Saturday, March 19, 2005

Entertainment Weekly's review of the NBC version of "The Office"

I have to admit. I'm not really a fan . . . of The Office. (Sorry guys.) I have watched the first disc of the DVD that Rainsinett lent to me--epsiodes 1-6. I see the value and the skill of the show. I do laugh at much of it. But, I just don't love it.
Maybe I simply find Gervais' character too painful to watch. I don't know. (Do I identify with his clueless neediness? God, I hope I don't ever come across that way.) I just find him so inept that is is difficult to watch him make a complete ass of himself all the time. The other characters are simply that--characters for Brent to stumble around.
Will I watch the NBC version? Probably not. Believe it or not, I have enough TV to watch, thank you very much. And it is also a protest vote for screwing Scrubs one more time.
But, the premier episode is coming on this coming week, so read the review below and make your best judgement.
*****

In Good Company
(The Office's smart, biting 9-to-5 satire makes a smooth transatlantic crossing, by Gillian Flynn)

Dismay. Dubious sighs. A derisive snort. That's been the general reaction from fans upon hearing that NBC was launching a U.S. version of the BBC comedy The Office (premiering Thursday, March 24, at 9:30 p.m., before settling into its regular time slot [Tuesdays, 9:30 p.m. . . . whither Scrubs?]). Why tinker with that new-millennium classic--a painfully genuine mocumentary series about a dismal suburban paper-product company and the employees who toil there under David Brent (the perfect Ricky Gervais), a needy, tactless manager? But clearly in thrall to its previous successful transplants Coupling (oh . . . right . . . . that stunk) and Men Behaving Badly (oh . . . right . . . that stunk too), NBC moved forward with The Office.

The good news for fans--and neophytes--is that the new sitcom is clever and insular, capturing all the drudgery, awkwardness, and rivalry of cubicle living. Sure, the curious plot is so faithful to the BBC version, it's almost Van Santian. (For aficionados, it won't work: You can't help but see Gervais' roly-poly ghost in every scene.) But further episodes--which keep the basic framework but use mostly new dialogue--prove the series has crossed the pond handily. Seems workplace misery is universal.

In this new Office, The Daily Show's Steve Carell takes on the Gervais role (renamed Michael Scott). Carell has had practice playing a corporate tool: His new-room lapdog was the only funny thing in Bruce Almighty (sorry, Jim Carrey). With his gelled hair, wiry body, and tan-glow face, Scott is stridently on the make (make money, make friends, make women laugh so they'll sleep with me, please, please). He describes himself--in a recycled BBC line--as "a friend first, and a boss second . . . entertainer third."

Scott quickly learns that his branch is in danger of downsizing, the irony being that many of the underwhelmed employees would welcome a layoff. Chief among these are the receptionist, Pam (Jenna Fischer), who dreams of being an illustrator, and twenty-something salesman Jim (John Krasinski), who is too bored to finish explaining what he does for a living. The two alleviate their tedium with a mutual crush, despite Pam's jackass of a fiancé (David Denham, who, with a few words, vividly creates a painfully sullen, gone-to-seed jock).

NBC could have ruined the delicate dynamic of The Office by over-Americanizing it. Some exec, at some point, must have floated the idea of morphing Pam into an Andersonian chesty blond babe. Instead, played by the sweet-faced Fischer with an air of humor and neglect, Pam's the kind of woman who doesn't bother to finish brushing her hair because, really, who notices? Fischer and Krasinski have a gentle chemistry that should be fun to watch as Jim and Pam's attraction develops. Meanwhile Rainn Wilson, in the easty-to-overdo role of sycophant Dwight, reins in his nerd vibe just short of Urkel territory.

When the series does Americanize, it captures Scott's lower-middle-class life down to the knockoff Drakkar Noir bottles that litter his car. And when it goes broad, it gives us the future Diversity Day episode. Think of the toss-off racism of the original, plopped in a PC-gone-wrong showcase that might be entitled The Accidental Bigot. As when the African-American diversity trainer introduces himself as Mr. Brown, and Scott assures him, "I will not call you that."

This smart series may revive TV's interest in workplace sitcoms of the NewsRadio stripe--comedies that functioned almost as reality shows. See how smart people betray, bond, and go mad when trapped in petty bureaucracies. Ultimately, though, The Office lacks the aching subtlety of the BBC version. In the Brit sitcom, Jim (there named Tim) was a melancholy fellow who deserved better, but he lacked the imagination and stomach to get it--and knew it. Krasinski's Jim knows the job sucks, but he's deeply ironic about it. More damaging is Carell's Scott, who is without the sad eagerness of Gervais' manager. It was this undertow that gave the original Office such heart (and heartbreak). Seeing Brent try to connect, impress, or sympathize, yet always get it wrong was like watching a guy play Wiffle ball in a stiff wind. Hilarious yet poignant. So far Carell's manager is such a doofus, such a plastic man, that this entertaining American version may never reach that deeper layer of humor. But as every American office drone knows, a copy is never quite as perfect as the original. B

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Friday, March 18, 2005

Robots is boring

Kev, Stevie, and I saw "Robots" the other night. Eh! Just as the critics say, the animation is dazzling (but not overly spectacular), the storyline is ludicrously formulaic, and the voices? BLAH. Robin Williams wasn't overly obnoxious, and the gal who did the voice for his kid sister was good, but the rest were pretty lame. Especially Halle Barry--but she's pretty boring, anyway, once she starts talking. Compare her voicing to Ellen Degeneres's masterful and hilarious job of voicing "Dory" in Finding Nemo . . . well, there's no comparison. To be fair, Dory had many more fun lines, and that's all part of the problem with Robots, huh?

The scenes at the "chop shop", where old robots are sent to die, is a little too Holocaust-y to be deemed family fun. Stevie was actually wanting to go home during the dark bits. Still, there were enough cute kid moments to keep him in his seat.

Shrek, Finding Nemo, and The Incredibles have spoiled many a moviegoer. They are truly wonderful movies, full of imagination, humor, and character. Robots had it's cool visual moments, but that's about it.

Grade: C

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Wednesday, March 09, 2005

Yahoo streams TV

Use the link on the post title to go to Slate.com's SurferGirl blog.

Then scroll down and read the post for Monday March 7 about Yahoo streaming the Showtime broadcast of its new show Fat Actress.

It sounds interesting. Watching Showtime online? But who know's if the show itself is any good?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Tuesday, March 08, 2005

I'm a robot programmed not to know that I'm a robot.

What happens when The Matrix meets hip hop, you ask?

Well, what about this?

Ever wondered what a rap song would sound like when backed by a toothbrush? Well, wonder no more. WARNING . . . this one contains a curse word!

1 Comments:

Blogger Sven Golly said...

That's GREAT STUFF. Tooth and gum percussion will never be the same. Floss in G-major. Or is that one of those fake memories?

5:20 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Thursday, March 03, 2005

The Frogurt is also CURSED!!

What does it all mean?

4 8 15 16 23 42

I tried many different things . . . prime numbers, squares of prime numbers, adding together prime numbers to figure out the intervals. NOTHING made sense!

4 8 15 16 23 42

I need David Krumholtz the actor that plays the math genius younger brother on CBS's new hit show NUMB3RS! He can calculate the trajectory of five bullets by observing the water droplet patterns in a lawn sprinkler; so surely, he could figure this simple sequence out.

4 8 15 16 23 42

Am I looking at it all wrong? Is is 48151 and 62342? Are they zip codes?

4 8 15 16 23 42

Does it somehow involve Rimbaldi? (Oh, please YES . . . let it involve Rimbaldi!)

4 8 15 16 23 42

AAARGGH!! (Did I hear monkeys screeching from beneath the hatch?!

4 8 15 16 23 42

1 Comments:

Blogger David said...

For more information on Lost that is not so devoted to the labyrinth of fan message boards and nerd-dom, check out this weekly MSNBC.com column on LOST revelations.
[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6867118/]
It is written by one of the blogging Damn Hell Ass Kings and creator of the Pop Culture Junk Mail site.

8:06 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home